random archive ask me rss
Emerald and Silver
via  dont-be-obvious  (originally  dont-be-obvious)
3 months ago on 13 February 2012 @ 10:14pm 320 notes
via  cantleavecantstay  (originally  cantleavecantstay)
3 months ago on 13 February 2012 @ 10:13pm 485 notes

The response has been overwhelmingly Slytherin.

And I don’t think that’s because we’re all Slytherins. You guys have made some very good points, really.

If that’s the case, then welcome, Sherlock, to Slytherin house. :)

4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 2:31pm 9 notes
P2 impress someone that will get him to places he needs to be. This is definitely Slytherin. Only using/impressing people when it's to your advantage. All coming from a Slytherin :)
4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 2:30pm
P1 For the pro of Ravenclaw: He’s always wanting to be the smartest in the room and to impress people with his cleverness. This is actually very Slytherin like. Always wanting to be the smartest in the room = determination and he will probably do anything he can to be that person. This is a very Slytherin trait. Impressing people with his cleverness. I don't watch Sherlock but I guess he would try to impress everyone one but try the hardest to impress/anger his enemies or to impress someone to..
4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 2:30pm
Sherlock = Slytherin (not just because I want him in our house or anything...). But I really believe he is. He has so many emotions and sometimes he lets them slip a little and take over, but he generally hides them and doesn't let people in, hence Slytherin. Just look at Scandal in Belgravia *sob* I've always imagined Ravenclaws to be quite heartless. Just because he's super intelligent doesn't make him Ravenclaw automatically..(:
4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 2:30pm
Anonymous
Further on the Sherlock subject, there are different kinds of intelligence. Slytherins are known as being quite shrewd. Sherlock uses deduction skills, which is a type of shrewdness.
4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 2:15pm
Anonymous
The con listed for Ravenclaw about how he deletes useless knowledge proves he doesn't belong in Ravenclaw. The house of the eagle is specifically for those who seek out all sorts of knowledge. Both Ravenclaw and Slytherin seek knowledge, but Ravenclaw seeks it for the sheer want to learn. Slytherins learn what they need to in order to win, succeed, and/or move forward. The fact that Holmes doesn't have the key trait of a Ravenclaw means he wouldn't be in Ravenclaw.
4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 2:15pm 4 notes
Anonymous
He is a Slytherin he shares a lot of traits and not enough Ravenclaw. I have a lot of Ravenclaw friends and Slytherin as well as being a slytherin myself and i think his determination and ambition that separates him from Ravenclaw.
4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 1:14pm 1 note
Anonymous
Sherlock is the epitome of a slytherclaw! I think he could be a cunning ravenclaw or a very knowledgeable slytherin.
4 months ago on 6 January 2012 @ 12:34pm 6 notes